header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Faking it? AI and the rise of forged evidence in litigation

04 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Dispute resolution , Artificial intelligence , Technology
printer mail-detail
224738
There is a growing threat of forged evidence in civil litigation—now supercharged by generative AI—which Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis explores in this week’s NLJ

From the Bitcoin creator case to WhatsApp screenshots and AI-generated documents, Gascoigne shows how courts are grappling with increasingly sophisticated fakery. He revisits key cases, including Arrow Nominees v Blackledge and Takhar v Gracefield, to illustrate how courts assess and respond to fabricated evidence.

Gascoigne warns that AI tools can create convincing fakes with no obvious signs, making the ‘sniff test’ and metadata analysis more vital than ever. He urges litigators to challenge suspect documents under CPR 32.19 and to demand draft versions where appropriate.

With US courts already drafting rules on machine-generated evidence, Gascoigne calls for urgent action from UK regulators to ensure authenticity and uphold the duty not to mislead the court.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll