header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Faking it? AI and the rise of forged evidence in litigation

04 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Dispute resolution , Artificial intelligence , Technology
printer mail-detail
224738
There is a growing threat of forged evidence in civil litigation—now supercharged by generative AI—which Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis explores in this week’s NLJ

From the Bitcoin creator case to WhatsApp screenshots and AI-generated documents, Gascoigne shows how courts are grappling with increasingly sophisticated fakery. He revisits key cases, including Arrow Nominees v Blackledge and Takhar v Gracefield, to illustrate how courts assess and respond to fabricated evidence.

Gascoigne warns that AI tools can create convincing fakes with no obvious signs, making the ‘sniff test’ and metadata analysis more vital than ever. He urges litigators to challenge suspect documents under CPR 32.19 and to demand draft versions where appropriate.

With US courts already drafting rules on machine-generated evidence, Gascoigne calls for urgent action from UK regulators to ensure authenticity and uphold the duty not to mislead the court.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll