header-logo header-logo

04 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Criminal , National security , International
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: In hot water? Defending small boat pilots post-Borders Act

224735
Writing in NLJ this week, Aneurin Brewer of Red Lion Chambers offers a practical defence guide for small boat pilots charged under the Immigration Act 1971, as amended by the Nationality and Borders Act 2022

Brewer explains how the new offences—particularly s 24(D1) and s 25—have made it harder for asylum seekers to defend themselves, despite often being coerced into piloting. He highlights the importance of prosecutorial discretion and the potential for abuse of process arguments, especially where CPS guidance is ignored.

Brewer also explores the unusual mens rea in s 25(1)(b), arguing that genuine ignorance of the law may still offer a defence. With sentencing thresholds triggering deportation risks, many defendants are incentivised to plead to lesser charges.

Brewer’s analysis is essential reading for defence lawyers navigating this complex and politically charged area of law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll