header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal , Diversity
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Jury trial shake-up meets resistance

252772
© Getty images
Government plans to curb jury trials have received only qualified support from Parliament’s Justice Committee, which has raised serious concerns about the Courts and Tribunals Bill

Writing in NLJ this week, Michael Zander KC, NLJ columnist, examines a report that stops short of rejecting the reforms but recommends extensive amendments.

The committee doubts magistrates’ courts can absorb the additional workload, describing the government’s target of 21,000 magistrates by 2029 as unrealistic. It also questions proposals to remove defendants’ right to elect jury trial and to replace full rehearing appeals with narrower reviews.

The report highlights concerns about judge-only trials, retrospective application of reforms and the lack of appeal rights against allocation decisions. Particularly striking is its criticism of judicial diversity, noting that only 1% of Crown Court judges are Black. The committee calls this ‘shocking’ and urges a representative judiciary by 2035.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll