header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal , Diversity
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Jury trial shake-up meets resistance

252772
© Getty images
Government plans to curb jury trials have received only qualified support from Parliament’s Justice Committee, which has raised serious concerns about the Courts and Tribunals Bill

Writing in NLJ this week, Michael Zander KC, NLJ columnist, examines a report that stops short of rejecting the reforms but recommends extensive amendments.

The committee doubts magistrates’ courts can absorb the additional workload, describing the government’s target of 21,000 magistrates by 2029 as unrealistic. It also questions proposals to remove defendants’ right to elect jury trial and to replace full rehearing appeals with narrower reviews.

The report highlights concerns about judge-only trials, retrospective application of reforms and the lack of appeal rights against allocation decisions. Particularly striking is its criticism of judicial diversity, noting that only 1% of Crown Court judges are Black. The committee calls this ‘shocking’ and urges a representative judiciary by 2035.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll