header-logo header-logo

23 January 2026
Issue: 8146 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Legal aid focus , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Justice for some, access for few?

240528
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026

Parliamentary committees have delivered ‘scathing’ criticism of the MoJ’s stewardship of legal aid, with one MP suggesting it be renamed the ‘Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’.

While ministers talk up third-party funding, court decisions such as PACCAR and Evans v Barclays have chilled the market, raising hurdles for collective actions. Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe, notes that the UK now ranks ‘30th out of 31’ comparable nations for affordable civil justice. Digital fixes have failed the ‘digitally excluded’, and successive reforms have merely shifted risk onto lawyers and funders.

The result? A justice system admired abroad but increasingly inaccessible at home.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll