header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 January 2026 / David Greene
Issue: 8146 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

‘The Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
240528
Will access to justice gain a much-needed boost in 2026? David Greene fears that the signs are not looking promising

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Commons’ Justice Committee are both examining the justice system and access to justice for citizens.

The PAC reported this month in scathing terms on the work of Ministry of Justice (MoJ) regarding legal aid. To loud support from practitioners, the PAC concluded that the ministry is not doing enough to understand the impact of its reforms, which removed access to most early legal advice over a decade ago, nor to ensure the future sustainability of the legal aid market following historic cuts to the legal aid budget and present-day restrictions—some rates for representatives have not been increased for 30 years. The chair of the PAC, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, suggested renaming the Ministry of Justice as ‘the Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’.

The Justice Committee, now chaired by former barrister Andy Slaughter, is conducting a formal inquiry into access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll