header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 January 2026 / David Greene
Issue: 8146 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

‘The Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
240528
Will access to justice gain a much-needed boost in 2026? David Greene fears that the signs are not looking promising

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Commons’ Justice Committee are both examining the justice system and access to justice for citizens.

The PAC reported this month in scathing terms on the work of Ministry of Justice (MoJ) regarding legal aid. To loud support from practitioners, the PAC concluded that the ministry is not doing enough to understand the impact of its reforms, which removed access to most early legal advice over a decade ago, nor to ensure the future sustainability of the legal aid market following historic cuts to the legal aid budget and present-day restrictions—some rates for representatives have not been increased for 30 years. The chair of the PAC, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, suggested renaming the Ministry of Justice as ‘the Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’.

The Justice Committee, now chaired by former barrister Andy Slaughter, is conducting a formal inquiry into access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll