header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 January 2026 / David Greene
Issue: 8146 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

‘The Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
240528
Will access to justice gain a much-needed boost in 2026? David Greene fears that the signs are not looking promising

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Commons’ Justice Committee are both examining the justice system and access to justice for citizens.

The PAC reported this month in scathing terms on the work of Ministry of Justice (MoJ) regarding legal aid. To loud support from practitioners, the PAC concluded that the ministry is not doing enough to understand the impact of its reforms, which removed access to most early legal advice over a decade ago, nor to ensure the future sustainability of the legal aid market following historic cuts to the legal aid budget and present-day restrictions—some rates for representatives have not been increased for 30 years. The chair of the PAC, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, suggested renaming the Ministry of Justice as ‘the Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’.

The Justice Committee, now chaired by former barrister Andy Slaughter, is conducting a formal inquiry into access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
Read All
Legal Action Group set out 2026 events calendar
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
NLJ this week: Volunteers, promotions & perilous appeals
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll