header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Light dispute sheds clarity on nuisance

08 August 2025
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Nuisance , Property , Damages
printer mail-detail
227504
The High Court’s decision in Cooper v Ludgate House Ltd [2025] EWHC 1724 (Ch) has brought much-needed clarity to rights of light disputes, as Andrew Francis of Serle Court explains in this week's NLJ

The court ruled that light from land designated under s 203 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 should be excluded from loss assessments, a novel legal point. It also reaffirmed the Waldram method as the standard for measuring light loss.

Despite finding actionable interference from the 19-storey Arbor building, the court declined to order demolition, awarding £3.75m in negotiating damages instead. The judgment provides a structured approach to calculating such damages, rejecting ‘ransom’ logic in favour of realistic, evidence-based valuation. It also offers a ‘sense check’ via capital value loss estimates.

This decision is a significant addition to nuisance law, offering guidance on both new and longstanding issues in property disputes.

Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Nuisance , Property , Damages
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll