header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Costs , Fees
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny

235684
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’

Regan highlights growing concerns that the decision may have been wrongly decided, after Regional Costs Judge Richard Lumb confirmed its binding effect on masters and district judges. The ruling restricts recoverable costs when unqualified staff conduct litigation, slashing claims to fixed-fee levels.

Regan reports Ben Williams KC’s suggestion that historic authorities—Myers v Elman and Hollins v Russell—permit broader delegation than Mazur allows, implying the decision may contradict a century of practice.

The column also touches on unresolved medical agency fee disputes, a new non-party costs order against a credit hire company, and a poignant tribute to Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC, remembered as a fearless champion of justice and beloved NLJ columnist.

Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Costs , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll