header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Costs , Fees
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny

235684
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’

Regan highlights growing concerns that the decision may have been wrongly decided, after Regional Costs Judge Richard Lumb confirmed its binding effect on masters and district judges. The ruling restricts recoverable costs when unqualified staff conduct litigation, slashing claims to fixed-fee levels.

Regan reports Ben Williams KC’s suggestion that historic authorities—Myers v Elman and Hollins v Russell—permit broader delegation than Mazur allows, implying the decision may contradict a century of practice.

The column also touches on unresolved medical agency fee disputes, a new non-party costs order against a credit hire company, and a poignant tribute to Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC, remembered as a fearless champion of justice and beloved NLJ columnist.

Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Costs , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll