header-logo header-logo

06 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , International , Sanctions , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Navigating the UK & US anti-Putin sanctions regimes

221390
The UK and US sanctions regime against Russia have notable differences, and President Trump has indicated he may lift certain sanctions. In this week’s NLJ, James Clark, partner, Ian Hargreaves, partner, and James Philippsohn, associate, of Quillon Law, discuss the sanctions landscape and how it applies to businesses and individuals

They note that ‘the US asserts a much broader extraterritorial reach’ than the UK; for example, sanctions can apply if the transaction is conducted in US dollars or clears through the US financial system even if no US person is directly involved. Another crucial difference is the US use of ‘secondary sanctions’, which target non-US persons outside the US.

Clark, Hargreaves and Philippsohn write: ‘It is possible for a transaction to be permitted under US law but a criminal offence under the UK sanctions regime, and vice versa. These differences are likely to increase given the divergence in the US’s and the UK’s approach to Russia.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll