header-logo header-logo

15 November 2024
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Radical solutions needed for legal aid

196803
It feels like civil legal aid has been in crisis forever—so is the current system simply irreparable? In this week’s NLJ, Roger Smith, former director of JUSTICE, argues that we need a radical rethink.

Smith writes: ‘The brutal truth is that the model of civil legal aid developed as part of the post-war welfare state is bust.’ He traces the rise and fall of legal aid, from its inception in 1949 to its peak in 2010 and subsequent decline as legislation removed most civil areas from scope in 2013.

He makes two major suggestions, one of which is to ‘rework legal aid as a community or national legal service which incorporates a wider range of providers’. 

Issue: 8094 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll