header-logo header-logo

10 January 2025
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Legal News , Crypto , Criminal , Fraud , Technology
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Recovery of stolen cryptoassets possible thanks to recent law

202615
Could law enforcement agencies tasked with recovering stolen cryptoassets have a silver bullet in their arsenal? In this week’s NLJ, Ashley Fairbrother, partner, and Joe Nahal-Macdonald, senior associate, at Edmonds Marshall McMahon, and Sarah Wood, barrister at 5 St Andrews Hill, examine the new powers provided by Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, courtesy of legislation implemented in 2024.

Part 5 now provides for ‘the seizure, detention, freezing and forfeiture of cryptoassets and related items’, and these powers are exercisable by the magistrates’ court. This could be highly useful, given British Virgin Islands-based company Tether’s ‘ability to destroy tokens (burning) and issue new ones (minting) to manage supply or adjust token balances across different blockchains’.

Fairbrother, Nahal-Macdonald and Wood write: ‘The choice by law enforcement must be purposive constructive of legislation, to use their most powerful weapon—POCA 2002—to tackle fraudsters and help their victims, which US law enforcement has shown no hesitation in doing.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll