header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Reflections on the Crown Court Study

05 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
237717
Cracked trials and weak cases: Professor Michael Zander revisits his landmark 1993 Crown Court Study in this week's NLJ, arguing that its insights remain strikingly current

He highlights persistent concerns about defendants pleading guilty despite potential acquittals, with more than 1,000 ‘inconsistent pleaders’ a year and thousands of cracked trials in which late pleas waste vast police and witness time.

Judges and barristers rated around one fifth of contested cases as weak, with several thousand annually said not to merit prosecution.

The study also exposed the impact of ambush defences, prior convictions, and challenges to confessions or scientific evidence.

Despite these flaws, Zander found the system broadly functional—though not necessarily fair in every case. He concludes that, while a modern repeat of the research is improbable, there is little reason to think outcomes today would differ greatly.

Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll