header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Triple cover, single mistake?

226825
How do overlapping insurance policies interact? In NLJ this week, Chris Bates and Jordan Ball of Penningtons Manches Cooper explore this question in Watford Community Housing Trust v Arthur J Gallagher Insurance Brokers Ltd 

The claimant, a housing trust, held three policies covering data breaches but only notified one, based on negligent broker advice. When losses exceeded the £6m recovered, the trust sued. The broker argued that ‘other insurance’ clauses limited total recovery to £5m. The court disagreed, ruling that the clauses cancelled each other out, entitling the claimant to the full £11m across all policies.

The judgment confirms that multiple insurance is lawful and beneficial—provided policies lack ‘rateable proportion’ clauses. For insureds, it’s a win for commercial common sense. For insurers, it’s a warning: if you want to limit liability, say so clearly. Brokers, meanwhile, are reminded that poor advice can prove costly.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll