header-logo header-logo

14 August 2026
Issue: 8174 / Categories: Legal News , International justice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What future for International Law?

257124
As geopolitical conflicts multiply, the widening gap between the rules of international law and the conduct of powerful states is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore

Simon Parsons considers this loss of confidence through the UN Charter framework, under which Article 2(4) prohibits the use of force and Article 51 permits self-defence subject to necessity and proportionality. He links US conduct in the Americas to a revived Monroe Doctrine and argues that the weakening of “Pax Americana” in Europe is placing greater responsibility on European states for their own security. Russia’s war in Ukraine and US action against Iran also raise serious questions about compliance with the Charter and the limitations of international accountability mechanisms.

Parsons is particularly concerned by reliance on a politically defined “rules-based international order” as an alternative to orthodox international law. His warning is stark: if powerful states increasingly interpret international rules according to their own national interests, other states may feel equally entitled to disregard established legal constraints on the use of force. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll