Last month, the Supreme Court in Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority confirmed that s 10(1) of the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985 grants the public a right to camp on Dartmoor’s commons. Writing in NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson analyses the landmark ruling
The court found that ‘open-air recreation’ includes wild camping, provided access is gained on foot or horseback. This overturns a previous High Court decision and affirms public rights over private objections. The ruling emphasises statutory interpretation grounded in ordinary language and context, rejecting arguments that the right to camp must be explicitly stated.
The court also criticised the absence of the Attorney General in proceedings affecting public rights.
The judgment is a win for access campaigners and clarifies that landowners’ rights can be limited by clear statutory language. It sets a precedent for interpreting public access laws in favour of recreation and transparency.
RELATED ARTICLES
7670829bf5ee4855af368e509c9111b6.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=d9eca78_1)
