header-logo header-logo

24 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Crypto , Cyber , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: AI & crypto-wallet freezing

174016

There’s a double bill of tech in this week’s NLJ. Ian McDougall, EVP & general counsel, LexisNexis Legal & Professional, sets out what lawyers need to know about artificial intelligence (AI). Nick Barnard, partner, Corker Binning, reports on new legislative tools being used by enforcement agencies to seize, freeze or destroy cryptoassets

McDougall explains what AI is, how it works, the difference between extractive and generative AI, and why lawyers should embrace closed AI models. From the Turing Test to large language models, his engaging, easy-to-understand article cuts through the hype. He writes: ‘It is not on a quest for truth and morality… It uses statistical analysis to predict the next most sequentially probable word and then produce it.’

Barnard looks at recent amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 that introduce crypto-wallet freezing orders and crypto-wallet forfeiture orders. Criminals love cryptoassets due to the fact they’re easy to hide and difficult to trace. Barnard explains why he thinks judges and magistrates are unlikely to refuse applications for the new freezing and forfeiture orders. He offers tips on how to advise clients who are on the receiving end of such orders.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll