header-logo header-logo

24 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Back to the 1980s

NLJ columnist Stephen Gold takes us back to the grimy days of the 1980s in this week’s 'Archive: Civil Way'. 

It’s a fascinating trip encompassing PACE, the miners’ strike and Channel 4’s Case on camera in which retired Old Bailey Judge Alan King-Hamilton QC acted as arbitrator. Gold also reminisces about Walter Merricks’s work in the 1980s—whatever happened to him?

A relaxation of the rules on solicitors advertising led to a flurry of newsletters and the appearance of ads in papers and magazines. Meanwhile, William Goodhart QC wrote a polemic in the NLJ advocating the abolition of the ‘archaic and unnecessary’ existence of silks.

Gold serves up anecdotes, commentary and nuggets from the heady 1980s here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll