header-logo header-logo

17 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Brexit Bonfire Bill could cause ‘unintended’ fire damage

111190
The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill is so enormous in scope that it is difficult to gauge the full extent of its implications. 

Writing in this week’s NLJ, however, Arnold & Porter partner Dr Beatriz San Martin, counsel Libby Amos-Stone and trainee solicitor Lewis Pope, assess the various aspects of the Bill in turn, highlighting the main parts of the Bill.

Their article is timely—it could be in law as soon as April 2023. They look at its impact on the role of the courts and the likelihood of increased costs and uncertainty for court users, and how the Bill ‘allows for the reorganisation of hierarchies’.

With tight deadlines imposed by the sunsetting clause, it is going to be a marathon run at a sprinter’s pace if the work of reviewing all the legislation affected is to be done. San Martin, Amos-Stone and Pope warn the consequence of such rushed reform will be ‘unanticipated and unintended consequences’.

See the article in full here

Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll