header-logo header-logo

30 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law , International justice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Child abductions on holiday (Pt 2)

96051
In the second in a series of articles in NLJ on child abductions, Mani Singh Basi looks at cases where children go on holiday and are not returned home. 

The Hague Convention helps secure the swift return of wrongfully removed children in many cases, but what are the limitations of the Convention?

One major difference between domestic legislation and the Convention is the child’s welfare. While the child’s short-term welfare is a key consideration under the Convention, the long-term welfare of the child is considered to be a matter for the domestic courts.

Basi writes that this ‘is a very specialist area of the law with concepts that are not found within the standard family cases’.

Read the latest piece here, and Part 1 here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll