header-logo header-logo

Holiday abductions: far from home (Pt 2)

30 September 2022 / Mani Singh Basi
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , International justice
printer mail-detail
96051
Mani Singh Basi examines the benefits & limitations of the Hague Convention in child abduction cases
  • The Hague Convention exists to secure the swift return of children who have been wrongly removed from their home country.
  • However, when a child has been abducted to a country that is not part of the Convention, securing their return can be much more difficult.

In the July edition of NLJ, I published ‘Holiday abductions: far from home’ (NLJ, 22 July 2022, p8), which touched upon the 1980 Hague Convention in respect of wrongful removal/retention cases when a child does not return from a planned holiday. This article considers the limitations (if any) of the Hague Convention 1980.

Barriers to a swift return

The Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (‘the Convention’) is a treaty developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. At the time of writing, there are 101 contracting parties to the Convention.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll