header-logo header-logo

12 January 2024
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Claims without cover

152835
Solicitor professional indemnity cover may be wide in scope, but firms still find themselves facing claims for which they are not covered

In this week’s NLJ, Frank Maher, partner in Legal Risk, writes that solicitors in England & Wales are often said to ‘have the widest cover of any profession in the world’ due to the breadth of their regulator’s Minimum Terms and Conditions.

However, he also points out: ‘All-embracing though solicitors’ insurance may appear to be, it is not without gaps.’ Maher, whose firm specialises in professional indemnity insurance law and professional regulation, presents examples of such gaps, gleaned from a wide range of cases where he has acted for firms.

Risks include insurers’ rights of reimbursement, and aggregation of claims arising from similar acts where a single policy limit applies.  

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll