header-logo header-logo

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Commercial success or committing an offence―the boundaries of reserved legal activities

90472
What is a reserved legal activity? The answer, writes John Gould, senior partner, Russell-Cooke, in this week’s NLJ, is increasingly hard to define

While the general public think lawyers and legal services are regulated, a large number of providers are not? So where are the boundaries, and how do you know when they’ve been crossed?

‘With increasing numbers of non-regulated providers, the boundaries of what they can and cannot do are ever more important,’ says Gould.

‘Yet these boundaries are not impenetrable barriers, but rather a zone of jeopardy within which an unauthorised entrant may either find that they can enjoy commercial success, or else be guilty of a criminal offence.’

In this article, Gould looks at the definitions, the issues at stake and the case for modernisation.

Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll