header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Crackdown on public protest

08 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail
87136
Are we still allowed to protest?

Maybe, as long as we do it quietly and don’t disturb anyone. Writing in this week’s NLJ, Neil Parpworth, of Leicester De Montford Law School, looks at recent curbs and restrictions introduced by the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022.

He peruses the ins and outs of the Act, including future ‘clarification’ that could yet be introduced. On the offence of breaching a condition placed on a protest, for example, he writes: ‘The law has changed as to the mens rea element of the offence and also as to maximum penalties. Henceforth, the offences will be capable of being committed where a person knows or ought to know that the condition they have breached has been imposed, rather than where they have knowingly failed to comply… This refinement of the knowledge requirement works in favour of the prosecution.’

Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll