header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Does the Fraud Act need updating?

21 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal , Technology
printer mail-detail
98015
It’s been 15 years since the Fraud Act 2006 took effect, and the scale and types of fraud have changed considerably. 

In this week’s NLJ, Stewart Hey & Abigail Rushton, of Charles Russell Speechlys, assess the Act’s success to date and outline outstanding issues.

Hey & Rushton contend that, for the Act to continue to succeed, three key issues should be considered—sentencing, the Act’s extra-jurisdictional reach, and the technological challenges of prosecuting fraud. They analyse each in turn.

Fraud is now the most common crime in England and Wales, and is said to cost the UK economy between £137bn and £190bn each year. Hey & Rushton write: ‘It is important that the UK has the legal framework to deal with the most complex cases of fraud and economic crime.’

See the full article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll