header-logo header-logo

21 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal , Technology
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Does the Fraud Act need updating?

98015
It’s been 15 years since the Fraud Act 2006 took effect, and the scale and types of fraud have changed considerably. 

In this week’s NLJ, Stewart Hey & Abigail Rushton, of Charles Russell Speechlys, assess the Act’s success to date and outline outstanding issues.

Hey & Rushton contend that, for the Act to continue to succeed, three key issues should be considered—sentencing, the Act’s extra-jurisdictional reach, and the technological challenges of prosecuting fraud. They analyse each in turn.

Fraud is now the most common crime in England and Wales, and is said to cost the UK economy between £137bn and £190bn each year. Hey & Rushton write: ‘It is important that the UK has the legal framework to deal with the most complex cases of fraud and economic crime.’

See the full article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll