header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Legal News , Civil way , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Gold reports on difficulties in court & the case that missed

Lack of personnel is creating havoc in court. In this week’s NLJ, former district judge Stephen Gold writes on ‘the mess’ in family courts where ‘frequent and widespread difficulties’ are arising due to a shortage of qualified legal representatives to cross-examine vulnerable witnesses.

The shortage is leading to an extraordinary and contradictory predicament where judges may have to ask the questions themselves ‘notwithstanding the guidance that the court should not itself conduct the cross-examination’.

Following this theme, Gold’s 'Civil way' column reports on the lack of compliant bids received for duty solicitors in housing possession cases.

He covers a highly relevant case that missed the deadline for inclusion in the Senior Courts Costs Office guide, and discusses consumer protection following the recent Supreme Court judgment on the Quincecare duty where a customer was tricked by fraudsters.

For pure Gold, see here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll