header-logo header-logo

23 April 2021
Issue: 7929 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Immigration rules create deportation risk for evictees and homeless

46628
Stop deporting homeless people and rethink your immigration rules, two lawyers have urged the Home Office.

The Home Office introduced the EU Settled Status (EUSS) scheme to allow EU nationals and their family members to apply for leave to remain in the UK, and in December 2020 introduced changes to the immigration rules regarding rough sleeping.

Writing in NLJ this week, Sioned Wyn Roberts, associate solicitor, Hodge, Jones & Allen, and Agata Patyna, barrister, Doughty Street raise several concerns about the rules, including that the definition of ‘rough sleeping’ is unclear. They highlight that non-EU nationals could find their leave cancelled if they find themselves in a position of rough sleeping.

With evictions set to rise once the pandemic restrictions, Wyn Roberts and Patyna raise concerns that those who end up sleeping rough will not want to seek support from local authorities for fear of deportation. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll