header-logo header-logo

30 April 2021
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Technology , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Justice in the age of the smartphone

47596
There’s a new legislative tool in town and it could be a game changer for criminal lawyers, Kingsley Napley criminal litigation partners Sandra Paul and Rebecca Niblock write in NLJ this week.

New guidance and a recent case address the vexing issues of whether a complainant should be required to give their mobile phone to investigators and how the police and prosecution should handle such vast reams of data.

‘From a defence lawyer’s perspective, [the case’s] (implicit) weighing of the Art 8 rights of complainants against suspects’ right to fair trial has tipped the scales into potential injustice,’ they write.

‘If no complaint or judicial notice arises from a complainant deliberately deleting relevant data, it is difficult to see how the right to a fair trial is preserved for the defendant.’

Paul and Niblock take a comprehensive look at the questions that arise and the potential approaches available.

Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Technology , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll