header-logo header-logo

28 April 2021 / Sandra Paul , Rebecca Niblock
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Unlocking digital disclosure

47596
Sandra Paul & Rebecca Niblock investigate a new legislative tool that could be a potential game-changer
  • New guidelines: disclosing digital material.
  • Balance: the right to a fair trial and the right to privacy.
  • Changes on the horizon: the coming into force of the Crime (Overseas Production Order) Act 2019.

Much water has passed under the bridge since January 2018, when the justice system faced a disclosure crisis, particularly in relation to sexual offences. Several high-profile rape trials collapsed, you may recall, due to the failure of the prosecution to disclose digital material. Disclosure is clearly fundamental in ensuring a defendant can receive a fair trial. An improvement plan was launched, the House of Commons’ Justice Committee held an inquiry and the attorney general launched a consultation, resulting in new guidelines in December 2020. These echoed the focus of the media on the impact on complainants who report sexual offences and are frequently required to hand over their mobile phones to investigators. However, questions remain about whether a complainant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll