header-logo header-logo

02 July 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week. Keeping it relevant - some tips for litigators

The High Court has made two unusual pre-trial orders within the space of a fortnight, indicating that parties ‘need not resign themselves to the cost and delay’ of side issues, barristers Daniel Lightman QC & Stephanie Thompson, of Serle Court, write in this week’s NLJ

In the lawsuit brought by the Duchess of Sussex against the Mail on Sunday for publishing a letter she wrote to her father, Mr Justice Warby agreed to strike out a number of allegations as they were not relevant to the Duchess’s case and would be likely to obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings.

A judge in a property dispute took a similarly ‘interventionist’ approach to case management, striking out several allegations.

Lightman & Thompson offer practical advice to litigators who may find themselves in a similar situation.

They conclude: ‘The court’s powers to exclude issues from consideration and limit evidence and cross-examination can have real teeth.’

Read the article in full here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll