header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week. Keeping it relevant - some tips for litigators

02 July 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
The High Court has made two unusual pre-trial orders within the space of a fortnight, indicating that parties ‘need not resign themselves to the cost and delay’ of side issues, barristers Daniel Lightman QC & Stephanie Thompson, of Serle Court, write in this week’s NLJ

In the lawsuit brought by the Duchess of Sussex against the Mail on Sunday for publishing a letter she wrote to her father, Mr Justice Warby agreed to strike out a number of allegations as they were not relevant to the Duchess’s case and would be likely to obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings.

A judge in a property dispute took a similarly ‘interventionist’ approach to case management, striking out several allegations.

Lightman & Thompson offer practical advice to litigators who may find themselves in a similar situation.

They conclude: ‘The court’s powers to exclude issues from consideration and limit evidence and cross-examination can have real teeth.’

Read the article in full here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll