header-logo header-logo

26 April 2024
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Property , Contract
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Lessons on document construction from a freehold dispute

169188

Mind the boilerplate small print for danger may lie within, warns Andrew Francis, Serle Court, in this week’s NLJ

Francis looks at Mackenzie v Cheung and another [2024] EWCA Civ 13, a Court of Appeal decision this year concerning the conveyance of the freehold title that became No 444 Selsdon Road, Croydon. He sets out the lessons to be learned.

The case provides ‘an example of the application of three important principles when we are advising upon the meaning and effect of legal documents’. Francis sets out the three principles and explains each in turn.

As for those boilerplate terms, he writes: ‘Traps are often hidden in them. Their presence is frequently camouflaged by their location at the end of long sets of terms or at the end of lengthy documents. So far as we do see them, we treat them (dangerously) with a lawyer’s insouciance.’ 

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll