header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Oscars starry feud prompts appearance equality debate

77719
A cruel joke followed by a slap grabbed the headlines and inspired heated debate at this year’s Oscars. Some even speculated it was staged

Dr Hannah Saunders, of Queen Mary University, London, focuses on the meanness of the joke, made against Jada Pinkett Smith, whose head is shaved as a result of her alopecia.

What legal protection is there for physical appearance, specifically hair loss? It’s not protected under the Equality Act.

Saunders explores this fascinating topic, including caselaw, and asks whether a new approach to appearance equality is needed. She writes: ‘What makes appearance fair game, when many other personal characteristics are not? And does law have a role in combatting appearance disadvantage?’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
back-to-top-scroll