header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Oscars starry feud prompts appearance equality debate

77719
A cruel joke followed by a slap grabbed the headlines and inspired heated debate at this year’s Oscars. Some even speculated it was staged

Dr Hannah Saunders, of Queen Mary University, London, focuses on the meanness of the joke, made against Jada Pinkett Smith, whose head is shaved as a result of her alopecia.

What legal protection is there for physical appearance, specifically hair loss? It’s not protected under the Equality Act.

Saunders explores this fascinating topic, including caselaw, and asks whether a new approach to appearance equality is needed. She writes: ‘What makes appearance fair game, when many other personal characteristics are not? And does law have a role in combatting appearance disadvantage?’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll