header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Oscars starry feud prompts appearance equality debate

77719
A cruel joke followed by a slap grabbed the headlines and inspired heated debate at this year’s Oscars. Some even speculated it was staged

Dr Hannah Saunders, of Queen Mary University, London, focuses on the meanness of the joke, made against Jada Pinkett Smith, whose head is shaved as a result of her alopecia.

What legal protection is there for physical appearance, specifically hair loss? It’s not protected under the Equality Act.

Saunders explores this fascinating topic, including caselaw, and asks whether a new approach to appearance equality is needed. She writes: ‘What makes appearance fair game, when many other personal characteristics are not? And does law have a role in combatting appearance disadvantage?’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll