header-logo header-logo

29 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Populist politics on crime: act tough, look tough

79592
Politicians love to look tough on crime and penal policy, but it’s a lamentable tradition, NLJ columnist Jon Robins writes this week

Robins highlights the latest example: Justice Secretary Dominic Raab’s announcement that he plans to ‘take back control’ of the Parole Board. It seems ‘unimaginable’ now, Robins writes, but there was a time when law and order was seen as ‘beyond the grubby world of politics’.

Sadly, Robins notes, the current administration in charge have all ‘read from the populist playbook and take the politicising of “law and order” to all-time lows’. 
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll