header-logo header-logo

29 April 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Populist policies on prison

79592
Jon Robins laments the rise of politicians trying to look tough on crime

Dominic Raab earlier this month announced plans to ‘take back control’ of the Parole Board. A ‘source’ told The Daily Telegraph the Justice Secretary planned to introduce ‘a ministerial check’ on the release of prisoners in the most sensitive cases. ‘This is about public protection’, the anonymous briefer said, before adding that the proposal would ‘dovetail’ with post-Brexit plans.

The Parole Board has long been in the government’s sights. In a column for The Telegraph in 2019, Boris Johnson, immediately before he became prime minister, launched a characteristically colourful attack on ‘soft justice’ and, in doing so, dismissed the body as ‘simple slaves to political correctness’. Johnson laid into our ‘cockeyed crook-coddling criminal justice system’ and lambasted ‘the Leftist culture’ of the criminal justice ‘establishment’.

Three years ago at a Justice Gap/Byline event, the former chief inspector of prisons Nick Hardwick made a gloomy prediction: ‘There is now going to be a lurch to penal populism.’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll