header-logo header-logo

07 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Public , Health & safety , National security , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Preventing another tragedy—the Manchester Arena inquiry reports

117938
Can lessons be learned from the Manchester Arena bombing that could help prevent a similar tragedy in the future?

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Slater and Gordon’s Richard Scorer, head of public inquiries, and Shane Smith, solicitor, assess the reports of the public inquiry into the 2017 bombing. Slater and Gordon acts for 11 of the families of those killed in the Manchester Arena bombing.

With nearly 300 witnesses giving evidence and more than a million pages of material to consider, the inquiry published three reports, the final one published in March 2023.

Scorer and Smith look at some of the ‘missed opportunities’ highlighted in the three reports, such as CCTV blindspots, as well as failures in the emergency response, such as poor communications, and a failure within MI5 to act swiftly on crucial intelligence. Devastatingly, the inquiry found a ‘realistic possibility’ MI5 could have thwarted the plot had it acted more decisively on two pieces of evidence. The next stage, as the authors write, is to ensure the inquiry’s recommendations are implemented. 

Read Scorer and Smith's assessment in full here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll