header-logo header-logo

10 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Damages , EU
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Product liability, WAMCA & Dutch legal innovation

171879

A recent Dutch ruling could have potential impact for product liability lawyers in the UK, write Sarah Moore, partner, and Lily Parmar, paralegal, Leigh Day, in this week’s NLJ

In February 2024, an Amsterdam court certified the first ‘opt out’ product liability group action anywhere in Europe. The case concerns textured breast implants and is brought on behalf of about 60,000 women. The relevant legislation is the Dutch Act on Collective Damages Claims (WAMCA).

Could the UK Law Commissions follow the Netherlands’ lead? Moore and Parmar look into the case, the legislation and the scope for similar action in the UK. They write: ‘There can be little doubt that in order to facilitate real access to justice, in the context of product liability claims and beyond, claimant lawyers need access to the type of collective/group actions that are now available in the Netherlands through procedural innovations such as WAMCA.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll