header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Protecting belief while safeguarding trans & non-binary people’s rights

169190

How should judges approach cases involving gender critical views? In this week’s NLJ, Oscar Davies, barrister at Garden Court Chambers, discusses this developing area of law

Davies asserts that judges may have taken a wrong turn in some recent cases relating to the Equality Act 2010. They consider a range of examples, including an in-depth look at ‘belief’ in the case of Maya Forstater, a sustainable development researcher who expressed gender critical views.

They write: ‘The tribunals have tied themselves in knots, which are only going to get knottier—with more claims coming from both sides—if they are not untangled soon. The consequence is that workplaces become less safe for trans people, and trans people may be less likely employed by employers due to envisaged issues.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll