header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Steering a course through a pandemic

06 August 2020
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
Bar chair Amanda Pinto QC relays the unprecedented events of her first six months in office, in an article in this week’s NLJ

Bar chair Amanda Pinto QC relays the unprecedented events of her first six months in office, in an article in this week’s NLJ

But for COVID-19, Pinto would have been in Chicago right now attending meetings with US lawyers. Instead, she is handling extraordinary challenges from an ‘office’ in her home. Parts of the Bar face ‘an existential risk’ due to drastic reductions in work, some chambers are unable to offer pupillages next year and ‘worse, others are unsure whether they will even exist’. From lobbying ministers to provide more financial support for barristers to helping devise safe ways for the justice system to continue, Pinto has worked hard to support barristers and promote access to justice.

Read Pinto’s inside view of the justice crisis here.

Issue: 7898 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll