header-logo header-logo

09 February 2024
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The private, the public & political parties

157362

Our current prime minister was ‘elected’ by about 160,000 Conservative Party members, yet members of the public have no right to know basic information about them

This includes how many live abroad and whether their identities were verified by the party. Should we be able to know this? How does the role of political parties sit within our constitutional rights and responsibilities?

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Dr Graham Zellick KC delves into the issue of whether political parties should be viewed as public bodies rather than private associations. They were held to be the latter by the High Court in a recent judicial review brought by Tortoise Media against the Conservative Party.

Zellick, a former Professor of Public Law at Queen Mary & Westfield College as well as a former Electoral Commissioner, writes: ‘Fordham J may have been adhering to the authorities, and his analysis and reasoning are indeed plausible, but they fly in the face of political and constitutional reality.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll