header-logo header-logo

22 July 2022
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Tracing the impact of Uber through significant cases

88169

One year on from the Supreme Court’s landmark ‘Uber’ decision, Charles Pigott examines its effect on employment law, in this week’s NLJ

Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve, traces its impact through four significant rulings from the Court of Appeal plus a number of Employment Appeal Tribunal cases since the judgment.

Uber v Aslam was a seminal case that looked at the status of workers in the so-called ‘gig economy’. Pigott writes: ‘There will always be a degree of unpredictability about employment status disputes. As the Uber decision itself emphasises, tribunals are charged with conducting a close examination of how the relationship operates in practice, on the understanding that every case is unique.’

He concludes that, one-year post-Uber, a clearer picture of the working relationship and worker status has emerged.

Issue: 7988 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll