header-logo header-logo

25 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , International , Brexit
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: UK-German probate

75876

Key points for understanding UK-German probate

Where probate cases involve considerations in both the UK and Germany, various hurdles may be encountered and costly mistakes made. Writing in this week’s NLJ, Bernhard Schmeilzl, co-founder of Graf & Partners, a boutique law firm specialising in UK-German legal matters, offers some valuable advice.

Schmeilzl highlights 11 common issues when drafting a will or applying for probate. He writes: ‘The typical advice given by English solicitors is to set up a separate independent will for the German assets. This is, however, rarely the best solution, because the existence of various wills may increase the risk of conflicting interpretation by (competing) executors, probate judges and the respective national tax authorities.’

Moreover, there are some considerable differences in approach between the two jurisdictions. For example, ‘German law does not apply the concept of a personal representative. Instead, in Germany the heirs (Erben) inherit the estate directly and immediately upon the death of the testator. There is no administration period.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll