header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Vicarious liability develops in trio of cases on limitation, historic asbestos exposure & foster care

22 September 2023
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
138499

The ever-evolving area of vicarious liability is tackled in this week’s NLJ personal injury update. Vijay Ganapathy, partner, and Catriona Ratcliffe, associate solicitor, at Leigh Day, look at the legal developments and implications of three recent cases

The cases concern a local authority found not vicariously liable for sexual abuse reported by a child in care, a historic asbestos case where exposure took place in the 1960s, and a judgment giving guidance on limitation in a tragic case where a client was left ‘high and dry’ by her solicitors.

Ganapathy and Ratcliffe write: ‘The scope of vicarious liability has broadened as the courts have recognised the changing nature of employment and that numerous relationships can be ‘akin to employment’.’

Issue: 8041 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Lawyers have broadly welcomed plans to electronically tag up to 22,000 more offenders, scrap most prison terms below a year and make prisoners ‘earn’ early release
David Lammy, Ellie Reeves and Baroness Levitt have taken up office at the Ministry of Justice, following the cabinet reshuffle
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll