header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Why we need to keep the biometrics & surveillance commissioner

24 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail
147366
The government intends to abolish the joint posts of Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner, which would be a big mistake, Michael Zander KC writes in this week’s NLJ

Instead, the roles will be bundled into the remit of the Information Commissioner’s Office. The aim is to ‘reduce duplication’ and a bill to enact this in law is currently before Parliament, albeit the bill appears to have stalled between the committee and report stages and is unlikely to make the statute book before next spring.

In this article, Zander, Emeritus Professor at the LSE, laments the potential abolition of the role and explains why it would be a serious loss, particularly for policing.

Zander draws on a recent report by the Centre for Research into Information Surveillance and Privacy to back up his argument.

Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll