header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Opinion , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Mind the (biometric) gaps

147366
Abolishing the post of the biometrics commissioner would be a mistake, says Michael Zander KC

When I first read that the government intended to abolish the joint posts of Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner (BSCC) I was concerned, but I am not an expert in this technical field and felt unable to judge. But I am now wiser—or at least better informed.

The 2021 consultation paper issued by the then Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport said: ‘The government will explore the potential for further simplifying the oversight framework by absorbing the functions of those commissioner roles into the ICO [Information Commissioner’s Office] which should bring benefits to data controllers and the public with a single route for advice, guidance and redress,’ (Data: A New Direction, September 2021, para 410).

The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill Pt V provides that the commissioner functions would be transferred instead to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. Part V is sponsored by the Home Office.

The Bill completed the commons committee stage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll