header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Opinion , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Mind the (biometric) gaps

147366
Abolishing the post of the biometrics commissioner would be a mistake, says Michael Zander KC

When I first read that the government intended to abolish the joint posts of Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner (BSCC) I was concerned, but I am not an expert in this technical field and felt unable to judge. But I am now wiser—or at least better informed.

The 2021 consultation paper issued by the then Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport said: ‘The government will explore the potential for further simplifying the oversight framework by absorbing the functions of those commissioner roles into the ICO [Information Commissioner’s Office] which should bring benefits to data controllers and the public with a single route for advice, guidance and redress,’ (Data: A New Direction, September 2021, para 410).

The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill Pt V provides that the commissioner functions would be transferred instead to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. Part V is sponsored by the Home Office.

The Bill completed the commons committee stage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll