header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

No carte blanche

Nicholas Dobson highlights a case where property rights trumped the local authority well-being power

In times past, generic local authority legal powers were rare as desert water. However, all that changed in 2000 when Pt 1 of the Local Government Act 2000 (LGA 2000) introduced the well-being power. This enabled authorities to do anything likely to promote or improve the economic, social or environmental well-being of their area or inhabitants.

Although the LAML decision of the Court of Appeal in June 2009 (Brent LBC v Risk Management Partners Limited and London Authorities Mutual Limited and Harrow London Borough Council as interested parties [2009] EWCA Civ 490, [2009] All ER (D) 109 (Jun)) had punctured the confidence of many authorities in the well-being power, the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) has now given birth to a bright and bouncing new all-purpose measure designed to set authorities free from the rusty chains of constricting vires. This is the general power of competence in Pt 1 of LA 2011 which (in soundbite overview) gives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll