header-logo header-logo

No carte blanche

07 September 2012 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Dobson highlights a case where property rights trumped the local authority well-being power

In times past, generic local authority legal powers were rare as desert water. However, all that changed in 2000 when Pt 1 of the Local Government Act 2000 (LGA 2000) introduced the well-being power. This enabled authorities to do anything likely to promote or improve the economic, social or environmental well-being of their area or inhabitants.

Although the LAML decision of the Court of Appeal in June 2009 (Brent LBC v Risk Management Partners Limited and London Authorities Mutual Limited and Harrow London Borough Council as interested parties [2009] EWCA Civ 490, [2009] All ER (D) 109 (Jun)) had punctured the confidence of many authorities in the well-being power, the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) has now given birth to a bright and bouncing new all-purpose measure designed to set authorities free from the rusty chains of constricting vires. This is the general power of competence in Pt 1 of LA 2011 which (in soundbite overview) gives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll