header-logo header-logo

22 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

No conflict here

Lawyers have been given the green light to act for both parties when drafting consensual family court judgments

Mr Justice Mostyn held, in JK v MK [2020] EWFC 2, this week, that there was no conflict of interest in jointly drafting consent orders.

According to the International Family Law Group, which represented online services provider amicable in the case pro bono, couples often seek help jointly when they have reached an agreement and want it reflected in court orders. Partner David Hodson said it was ‘frustrating’ for couples, having reached agreement, ‘then to be told they must each instruct a separate lawyer… Many can’t afford it’.

The decision also confirms that this work is not solely restricted to solicitors, and online service providers can draft family court orders using computer-based processes.

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll