header-logo header-logo

No conflict here

22 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have been given the green light to act for both parties when drafting consensual family court judgments

Mr Justice Mostyn held, in JK v MK [2020] EWFC 2, this week, that there was no conflict of interest in jointly drafting consent orders.

According to the International Family Law Group, which represented online services provider amicable in the case pro bono, couples often seek help jointly when they have reached an agreement and want it reflected in court orders. Partner David Hodson said it was ‘frustrating’ for couples, having reached agreement, ‘then to be told they must each instruct a separate lawyer… Many can’t afford it’.

The decision also confirms that this work is not solely restricted to solicitors, and online service providers can draft family court orders using computer-based processes.

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll