header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

‘No deal’ Brexit beckons

nlj_7799_news2_

Uncertainty abounds as Britain approaches EU exit deadline

Businesses are stepping up their contingency plans for a disorderly Brexit as key points remain unresolved two years after the EU Referendum, lawyers say.

The beleaguered EU Withdrawal Act gained Royal Assent this week, but the government has still not published its eagerly-anticipated White Paper on Brexit, and lawyers remain concerned about the lack of progress ahead of the UK’s exit on 29 March 2019.

Charles Brasted, partner in the Hogan Lovells Brexit Taskforce, said: ‘We are already seeing clients accelerate their own contingency plans, including for the possibility of a disorderly exit with no withdrawal agreement in place. Although 80% of the Withdrawal Agreement has been agreed, crucial aspects are unagreed and there will be no agreement unless it can all be resolved.’

Brasted said businesses in a whole range of sectors are hoping for ‘detailed and precise explanation of the government’s plans’ in the White Paper.

‘Both the UK and the EU are still aiming to agree the Withdrawal Agreement and a political declaration on the framework of the future relationship by October this year,’ he said. 

‘However, if significant progress is not made over the summer, this target may need to be revised. Some already believe agreement is not likely until late 2018 or even early 2019. The message from business continues to be “plan for the worst, hope for the best”. The focus on the former is certainly growing by the day.’

Writing in NLJ this week, David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: ‘Industry clients and, now, law firms are planning for the worst, a crash out in nine months, with Airbus and BMW the latest to plead for early certainty. Other than a broad optimism that everyone will see sense, there is little on the horizon that suggests that a crash out is not a distinct possibility’.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll