header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

No-fault divorce back in court

Family lawyers have hailed the Supreme Court’s decision this week to allow Tini Owens to appeal her divorce petition, in what has the potential to be a ground-breaking case.

The Court of Appeal refused to grant Mrs Owens a divorce after she failed to prove unreasonable behaviour, in Owens v Owens [2017[ EWCA Civ 182. Hugh Owens refused to divorce his wife, leaving Mrs Owen no option but to wait for a further three years’ separation.

Welcoming the Supreme Court’s decision to allow the appeal, Nigel Shepherd, national chair of family lawyers’ group Resolution, said the case ‘has significant implications for the future of divorce law in England and Wales.

‘The simple fact is that this case should not have been necessary, and only by implementing a no-fault divorce system can we ensure such a situation doesn’t happen again. Support for no-fault divorce is growing, from family law professionals, the public and politicians.’

 

 

Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll