header-logo header-logo

No limits on fines a “game changer”

19 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Magistrates have been given powers to impose unlimited fines across the board in a move which may take many by surprise. The implementation of s 85 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 means magistrates can now impose unlimited fines.

Previously, fines in the magistrates’ courts were capped at £20,000 per charge. Under s 85(1) the limit is removed on certain fines on conviction by a magistrates’ court “where, on the commencement day [12 March], a relevant offence would, apart from this subsection, be punishable on summary
conviction by a fine or maximum fine of £5,000 or more (however expressed), the offence is punishable on summary conviction on or after that day
by a fine of any amount”. 

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, says: “It’s a game changer. Only the future will inform us, but it will be extremely interesting to see how many cases will now remain in the lower courts and not be sent up to the Crown Court.

"These cases will include regulatory offences such as health and safety and environmental cases. Further, this change to sentencing powers was also highlighted in the recent Sentencing Council document relating to health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences guidelines."

 

Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll