header-logo header-logo

No limits on fines a “game changer”

19 March 2015
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Magistrates have been given powers to impose unlimited fines across the board in a move which may take many by surprise. The implementation of s 85 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 means magistrates can now impose unlimited fines.

Previously, fines in the magistrates’ courts were capped at £20,000 per charge. Under s 85(1) the limit is removed on certain fines on conviction by a magistrates’ court “where, on the commencement day [12 March], a relevant offence would, apart from this subsection, be punishable on summary
conviction by a fine or maximum fine of £5,000 or more (however expressed), the offence is punishable on summary conviction on or after that day
by a fine of any amount”. 

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, says: “It’s a game changer. Only the future will inform us, but it will be extremely interesting to see how many cases will now remain in the lower courts and not be sent up to the Crown Court.

"These cases will include regulatory offences such as health and safety and environmental cases. Further, this change to sentencing powers was also highlighted in the recent Sentencing Council document relating to health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences guidelines."

 

Issue: 7645 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll