header-logo header-logo

No Minister

28 January 2022 / John Gould
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail
69739
Misbehaviour in public office: John Gould examines the limitations of the Ministerial Code

Whenever a government minister is in trouble for misbehaving—which, let’s face it, is pretty often these days—much reference is made to the Ministerial Code. It is presented as the weight against which the potential sinner will be weighed in the balance and, if found wanting, the writing will be on the wall for their ministerial career. From the way it is presented, one might think that it was right up there with Magna Carta, the Napoleonic Code or the Riot Act made in the first year of the reign of King George. According to the BBC, if a minister breaches the code, they are expected to resign whatever the breach.

Precious principles

While it may be reassuring to think that ministers have to observe a code which operates in the same way as the codes and rules applying to professionals like doctors and lawyers, it is not actually so. In a regulatory sense, the code does not, in fact,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll