header-logo header-logo

28 January 2022 / John Gould
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

No Minister

69739
Misbehaviour in public office: John Gould examines the limitations of the Ministerial Code

Whenever a government minister is in trouble for misbehaving—which, let’s face it, is pretty often these days—much reference is made to the Ministerial Code. It is presented as the weight against which the potential sinner will be weighed in the balance and, if found wanting, the writing will be on the wall for their ministerial career. From the way it is presented, one might think that it was right up there with Magna Carta, the Napoleonic Code or the Riot Act made in the first year of the reign of King George. According to the BBC, if a minister breaches the code, they are expected to resign whatever the breach.

Precious principles

While it may be reassuring to think that ministers have to observe a code which operates in the same way as the codes and rules applying to professionals like doctors and lawyers, it is not actually so. In a regulatory sense, the code does not, in fact,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll