header-logo header-logo

28 January 2022 / John Gould
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

No Minister

69739
Misbehaviour in public office: John Gould examines the limitations of the Ministerial Code

Whenever a government minister is in trouble for misbehaving—which, let’s face it, is pretty often these days—much reference is made to the Ministerial Code. It is presented as the weight against which the potential sinner will be weighed in the balance and, if found wanting, the writing will be on the wall for their ministerial career. From the way it is presented, one might think that it was right up there with Magna Carta, the Napoleonic Code or the Riot Act made in the first year of the reign of King George. According to the BBC, if a minister breaches the code, they are expected to resign whatever the breach.

Precious principles

While it may be reassuring to think that ministers have to observe a code which operates in the same way as the codes and rules applying to professionals like doctors and lawyers, it is not actually so. In a regulatory sense, the code does not, in fact,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll