header-logo header-logo

Prisons have reached crisis point, says Gauke report

19 February 2025
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Governments need to focus on non-custodial ways to cut reoffending rather than simply trying to look tough by locking up criminals for longer, a report by former Lord Chancellor David Gauke has warned.

Gauke was asked by Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood in October to chair an independent review of sentencing policy and consider ways to solve the prison population crisis. He is due to deliver his recommendations in the spring.

In an interim report, ‘History and trends in sentencing’, published this week, however, he examines trends ‘which have brought the system dangerously close to collapse’, with 85,000 people in prison—40,000 more than in 1993. If the current trajectory were to continue, the prison population would reach between 97,300 and 112,300 in 2032.

The increase is the result, Gauke explains, of governments focusing on punishment in the shape of incarceration and longer sentences accompanied by ‘an underinvestment in probation and other alternatives that can provide rehabilitation and reduce reoffending’.

He said the use of certain prison alternatives has decreased—for example, community sentences made up about 26% of disposals in 1996 but only 6% in June 2024. However, custodial sentences have increased in length as well as number—the average stretch for indictable offences was 16 months in 1993 but 22.5 months in June 2024. The number of prisoners serving more than ten years (not including indeterminate and life sentences) rose from 487 in 2010 to 1,639 in June 2024.

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said: ‘This echoes our concerns about how we got here and the scale of the problem.

‘Successive governments’ aim to appear “tough on crime” has led to increases in the length of sentences. While increasing demands have been made of the system, they have not been accompanied by an overarching plan nor investment.

‘Reform must go hand in hand with greater transparency. A long prison sentence is the easy option, but it is not always the right long-term solution for offenders nor society. Ultimately, our sentencing regime needs to reduce crime and increase public confidence and safety.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘The report lays bare how prisons have reached crisis point.’

Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll