header-logo header-logo

25 July 2014 / Lehna Hewitt
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

No second helpings

family_update_hewitt

Lehna Hewitt examines the court’s approach to financial provision following an overseas divorce

Under Pt 3 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), the English courts have the power to grant financial relief where a marriage has been ended by a foreign decree recognised in this jurisdiction. The purpose of Pt 3 of MFPA 1984 is to alleviate the adverse consequences of inadequate financial provision being made on divorce by a foreign court. The English courts can make orders for financial provision including property adjustment, pension sharing, orders for sale, interim orders, avoidance of disposition orders and transfers of tenancies.

Since the landmark Supreme Court decision in Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] 2 All ER 877, there have been several notable decisions in this area which have further clarified and developed the law. The outcome of a successful application can be very beneficial to the financially weaker spouse; however, the purpose of this discretionary power is not to “improve” the financial outcome of a foreign divorce.

Considerations for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll