header-logo header-logo

No second helpings

25 July 2014 / Lehna Hewitt
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
family_update_hewitt

Lehna Hewitt examines the court’s approach to financial provision following an overseas divorce

Under Pt 3 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), the English courts have the power to grant financial relief where a marriage has been ended by a foreign decree recognised in this jurisdiction. The purpose of Pt 3 of MFPA 1984 is to alleviate the adverse consequences of inadequate financial provision being made on divorce by a foreign court. The English courts can make orders for financial provision including property adjustment, pension sharing, orders for sale, interim orders, avoidance of disposition orders and transfers of tenancies.

Since the landmark Supreme Court decision in Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13, [2010] 2 All ER 877, there have been several notable decisions in this area which have further clarified and developed the law. The outcome of a successful application can be very beneficial to the financially weaker spouse; however, the purpose of this discretionary power is not to “improve” the financial outcome of a foreign divorce.

Considerations for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll